Prime Minister Julia Gillard has indicated Labor will not try again to reinstate offshore processing if the Opposition votes down its amendments.
Ms Gillard repeatedly said today that if the Parliament voted down her Government’s contentious amendments to the Migrati
Prime Minister Julia Gillard has indicated Labor will not try again to reinstate offshore processing if the Opposition votes down its amendments.
Ms Gillard repeatedly said today that if the Parliament voted down her Government’s contentious amendments to the Migration Act then that would end offshore processing “for all time”.
It comes as two more boats carrying asylum seekers were intercepted overnight and taken to Christmas Island, where the more than 100 people on board would be processed.
The Government wants to change the law to give it the power to process asylum seekers offshore, after it said a recent High Court ruling effectively threw the legality of this in doubt.
However, the Opposition is planning to vote against the changes, demanding the Government accept an amendment that would effectively prevent Ms Gillard from reviving her so-called
Malaysia solution.
Opposition immigration spokesman Scott Morrison said that Ms Gillard should recall parliament, pass the Coalition’s amendments and reopen the processing centre on Nauru.
He said that almost 540 people had arrived since the Malaysian deal was signed for 800 transfers.
“The Government has never had a plan for illegal arrival 801, and illegal arrival 801 is only a few boats away,’’ he said.
“This point has been highlighted by the Commonwealth Ombudsman stated in their submission: ‘in our view there are no guarantees that the Agreement will have any long term utility or efficacy. Once the 800 transferee quota has been met it seems that the Agreement will be spent. Accordingly, it is not clear whether it is an ongoing or durable solution to the problems caused by humanitarian movements of people’.’’
Ms Gillard said Mr Abbott’s amendment – which would limit offshore processing to countries that have signed the United Nations refugee convention - would not get through Parliament and it was “crystal clear” that left just two options.
“Passing the legislation and enabling executive government to make appropriate arrangements for offshore processing … or seeing that legislation fail, in which case this government and governments in the future would have no option but to process asylum seekers on shore,’’ she said.
on Act then that would end offshore processing “for all time”.
It comes as two more boats carrying asylum seekers were intercepted overnight and taken to Christmas Island, where the more than 100 people on board would be processed.
The Government wants to change the law to give it the power to process asylum seekers offshore, after it said a recent High Court ruling effectively threw the legality of this in doubt.
However, the Opposition is planning to vote against the changes, demanding the Government accept an amendment that would effectively prevent Ms Gillard from reviving her so-called Malaysia solution.
Opposition immigration spokesman Scott Morrison said that Ms Gillard should recall parliament, pass the Coalition’s amendments and reopen the processing centre on Nauru.
He said that almost 540 people had arrived since the Malaysian deal was signed for 800 transfers.
“The Government has never had a plan for illegal arrival 801, and illegal arrival 801 is only a few boats away,’’ he said.
“This point has been highlighted by the Commonwealth Ombudsman stated in their submission: ‘in our view there are no guarantees that the Agreement will have any long term utility or efficacy. Once the 800 transferee quota has been met it seems that the Agreement will be spent. Accordingly, it is not clear whether it is an ongoing or durable solution to the problems caused by humanitarian movements of
people’.’’
Ms Gillard said Mr Abbott’s amendment – which would limit offshore processing to countries that have signed the United Nations refugee convention - would not get through Parliament and it was “crystal clear” that left just two options.
“Passing the legislation and enabling executive government to make appropriate arrangements for offshore processing … or seeing that legislation fail, in which case this government and governments in the future would have no option but to process asylum seekers on shore,’’ she said.